Although the terms flourishing and thriving are often used interchangeably in academic and policy discourse, they represent analytically distinct constructs with important implications for human development and urban design. Flourishing is broadly conceptualized as a multidimensional state of optimal functioning grounded in emotional, psychological, and social well-being, as well as the realization of individual potential (Ryff 2014; Seligman 2011; Nussbaum 2011). Its conceptual roots lie in the Aristotelian tradition of eudaimonia—a state of objective flourishing achieved by fulfilling one’s human potential through purposeful, virtuous action. Unlike the subjective feeling of modern “happiness,” it prioritizes meaning over pleasure, focusing on long-term fulfillment and “doing what is right” rather than seeking momentary gratification (hedonia). In modern psychology, it is often defined as self-actualization, the active process of realizing one’s true self and living in alignment with one’s highest values. It is operationalized through psychological models such as Ryff’s six-factor framework and Seligman’s PERMA theory, which emphasize autonomy, purpose, personal growth, positive relationships, competence, and accomplishment, as well as through the Capabilities Approach, which conceptualizes flourishing in terms of the substantive freedoms and real opportunities individuals have to pursue lives they have reason to value (Ryff and Singer 2006; Seligman 2011; Sen 1999; Nussbaum 2011).
Illustrating Flourishing Through Sinek’s Just Cause
Simon Sinek’s formulation of a “just cause” offers a vivid illustration for imagining what flourishing might look like at scale. He describes a world in which people begin the day inspired, feel safe wherever they go, and end the day fulfilled by their work (Sinek 2025). Although not a conceptual foundation, this imaginative articulation is useful because it captures experiential dimensions of flourishing: inspiration, security, and fulfillment. Although Sinek writes within leadership literature rather than developmental psychology, his depiction resonates with established eudaimonic models by emphasizing purpose, relational trust, and meaningful engagement.
His account underscores an important insight: flourishing is not merely an internal condition but is shaped by environmental supports and social structures.
Work as Vocation and the Search for Meaning
Sinek’s reflections on work help clarify one aspect of human flourishing: seeing work as something that gives purpose and meaning, not just as a way to earn a paycheck. Drawing on research in vocational psychology, Dik and Duffy (2009) describe vocation as a form of calling that integrates one’s capacities, commitments, and sense of purpose. This conception aligns fulfillment not with productivity but with meaningful participation in something larger than oneself. Something that leaves one “fulfilled” at the end of the day.
Viktor Frankl’s account of meaning deepens this insight. From his experiences in Nazi concentration camps, Frankl argued that human beings can discover fulfillment even under extreme deprivation by orienting themselves toward purpose—through creative responsibility, experiential depth, or courageous response to suffering (Frankl 1985). Fulfillment, in his view, is a byproduct of meaningful engagement rather than a direct pursuit. When applied to urban contexts, this suggests that thriving cities offer not only material resources but also opportunities for purpose, agency, and contribution. Meaning-making is thus a critical structure of flourishing city life.
Safety and the Conditions for Growth
Sinek also highlights multidimensional safety. Maslow (1943) first identified security as a prerequisite for higher-order psychological development. Later research expanded this understanding: Kahn (1990) conceptualized psychological safety as the freedom to express oneself without fear of negative consequences, and Edmondson (1999) empirically demonstrated its importance for learning and collaboration. Contemporary neuroscientific work, particularly Slavich’s Social Safety Theory (2020; 2023), shows that perceived safety shapes stress physiology, social behavior, and cognitive functioning.
These literatures converge on a critical point: environments that foster safety—physical, social, and psychological—create the conditions in which flourishing becomes possible. For cities, this implies that safety is not merely a prerequisite for civic order but a foundational infrastructure for human development and collective thriving.
Inspiration, Intrinsic Motivation, and Human Possibility
Inspiration, as described by Thrash and Elliot (2003), provides another window into flourishing. Unlike motivation grounded in external incentives, inspiration is evoked by ideals or possibilities that transcend immediate concerns. It aligns closely with intrinsic motivation theory, which holds that autonomy, competence, and relatedness support enduring engagement and well-being (Deci and Ryan 2000). Research further suggests that purpose-linked inspiration strengthens resilience and contributes to sustained well-being (Hill and Turiano 2014).
This literature illustrates how psychological states of inspiration, when supported by social and environmental structures, enable individuals to engage more fully in the activities that constitute flourishing.
A Thriving City Is One That Supports Human Flourishing
By contrast, thriving is typically understood as a dynamic, process-oriented construct that highlights positive growth, adaptation, and achievement in response to opportunities or challenges (Bundick et al. 2010; European Psychologist 2017). It is context-dependent and temporally variable, often associated with mastery, resilience, and success in specific domains. While flourishing denotes a relatively stable and holistic condition of well-being, thriving characterizes an active trajectory of development or performance within particular environmental settings (Health & Place 2025). Recent integrative reviews reinforce this distinction: flourishing centers on the fulfillment of potential and eudaimonic well-being, whereas thriving describes adaptive progress calibrated to the demands or affordances of a given context (Verma et al. 2025) such as cities.
This conceptual clarification establishes the foundation for examining how flourishing and thriving function within urban environments. The distinction is not merely semantic: it shapes how scholars and practitioners understand urban vitality, assess policy outcomes, and design environments that promote human development.
Across contemporary urban studies, a growing consensus holds that a thriving city is fundamentally one that supports flourishing for its residents (Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 2024; The Human Flourishing Program 2017; Nussbaum 2011). Human flourishing indicators—including health, safety, meaningful work, social connection, and equitable access to opportunity—serve as primary metrics in frameworks such as the Urban Human Needs (UHN) model and the Thriving Places Index (Earthbound Report 2018). These approaches conceptualize urban thriving not as economic vigor alone but as the systemic capacity to support well-being across diverse populations.
Yet the distinction between flourishing and thriving remains essential at the urban scale. A city may exhibit economic growth, infrastructural expansion, or technological advancement—forms of thriving in a narrow sense—without equitably fostering the holistic well-being of all residents (European Psychologist 2017). Thus, while flourishing individuals contribute to civic thriving, municipal indicators of thriving do not necessarily imply widespread flourishing. Urban thriving in its fullest sense requires intentional cultivation of the social, political, and environmental conditions that enable human flourishing across communities.
Where Humans Flourish, Cities Thrive
Human flourishing and urban thriving are mutually reinforcing processes, though not synonymous. Individuals flourish within systems that support meaning, safety, agency, and connection; cities thrive when their residents experience these conditions. Conversely, cities lacking structures that enable flourishing may exhibit economic or infrastructural growth while failing to promote human well-being.
Urban studies scholarship emphasizes this interdependence. Al-Hagla (2012) argues that cities must be deliberately designed to support well-being, social connection, and opportunities for self-development. Such design not only advances individual flourishing but strengthens civic cohesion and vitality. Thus, flourishing at the personal level and thriving at the civic level form a reciprocal dynamic: each sustains and amplifies the other.
Meaning-Making and the Architecture of Thriving Cities
Because meaning is central to flourishing, cities must provide opportunities and structures that enable residents to discover purpose. Material prosperity alone cannot generate coherence, belonging, or agency. Urban environments that support reflective engagement, expressive culture, relational life, and vocational alignment create the conditions under which flourishing becomes an everyday reality. Frankl’s warning remains salient: life becomes unbearable not because of circumstances but because of the absence of meaning (Frankl 1985). Cities attentive to meaning-making foster resilient, purpose-driven populations, which in turn contribute to civic thriving.
The relationship between human flourishing and thriving cities is reciprocal and dynamic. Thriving cities foster the multidimensional realization of human potential by providing the social, economic, environmental, and institutional conditions necessary for flourishing. In turn, flourishing populations contribute to the vitality, resilience, and adaptability of cities through civic participation, innovation, and social solidarity (Wolfram, Frantzeskaki, and Loorbach 2021; Miller, Douglass, and Rigg 2020).
Theoretical and empirical evidence converges on the conclusion that cities are not passive settings but are active agents in the co-production of flourishing. The design of urban environments, the inclusivity of governance structures, and the equitable distribution of opportunities are all critical determinants of whether cities enable or constrain the realization of human potential. As such, the study and promotion of human flourishing must be central to urban policy, planning, and practice, guiding the creation of cities that are truly thriving in the fullest sense.
What It Means for Humans to Flourish
Taken together, flourishing refers to a multidimensional state of optimal functioning characterized by:
- Autonomy: self-direction and agency (Ryff 1989)
- Purpose and Meaning: engagement with life’s goals (Seligman 2011)
- Personal Growth: ongoing development of potential (Ryff 1989)
- Positive Relationships: supportive, meaningful connections (Ryff 1989)
- Competence and Mastery: capacity to manage one’s environment (Ryff 1989)
- Self-Acceptance: positive self-regard (Ryff 1989)
- Engagement and Accomplishment: active involvement and achievement (Seligman 2011)
- Freedom and Capability: real opportunities to pursue valued ways of being and doing (Sen 1999; Nussbaum 2011)
The Capabilities Approach underscores that flourishing depends not only on subjective well-being but on substantive freedoms supported by social, economic, and political structures (Sen 1999; Nussbaum 2011). Flourishing thus emerges from the interplay of individual agency and enabling environments.
Conclusion
Flourishing and thriving are overlapping yet distinct constructs: flourishing denotes a state of optimal well-being and realized potential, while thriving describes dynamic growth and adaptive progress within particular contexts. At the urban scale, this distinction clarifies that cities thrive most fully when they intentionally cultivate the conditions that allow individuals to flourish. Human flourishing—rooted in meaning, safety, autonomy, connection, and capability—is therefore not a peripheral concern but the defining feature of genuine urban thriving. Designing and governing cities with this aim in view offers a coherent and ethically grounded pathway toward sustainable civic vitality.
He's been happily married for over 30 years. He and his wife, Donnalee, work with nearly /newlywed couples, married couples who want to improve their marriage, and couples in crisis.
- Measuring Domains for Thriving City - January 6, 2026
- Prospective Thriving Cities: Copenhagen, Osaka, and Melbourne - December 22, 2025
- The Thriving City - December 9, 2025
References
nnas, Julia. 1993. The Morality of Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Various editions.
Baltes, Paul B. 1987. “Theoretical Propositions of Life-Span Developmental Psychology: On the Dynamics Between Growth and Decline.” Developmental Psychology 23(5): 611–626.
Baltes, Paul B., and Margret M. Baltes. 1990. “Psychological Perspectives on Successful Aging: The Model of Selective Optimization with Compensation.” In Successful Aging: Perspectives from the Behavioral Sciences, edited by Paul B. Baltes and Margret M. Baltes, 1–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Benson, Peter L., Peter C. Scales, and Eugene C. Roehlkepartain. 2011. “The Contribution of the Developmental Assets Framework to Positive Youth Development Theory and Practice.” In Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Vol. 41, 197–230. Elsevier.
Bialowolski, Piotr, et al. “Human Flourishing in Cross Cultural Settings. Evidence From the United States, China, Sri Lanka, Cambodia, and Mexico.” Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019): 1269.
Bundick, Matthew J., David S. Yeager, Pamela E. King, and William Damon. 2010. “Thriving Across the Life Span.” In Handbook of Life Span Development, edited by Richard M. Lerner, Michael E. Lamb, and Alexandra M. Freund, 882–923. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Deci, Edward L., and Richard M. Ryan. 2000. “The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior.” Psychological Inquiry 11(4): 227–268.
Edmondson, Amy C. 1999. “Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly 44(2): 350–383.
European Psychologist. “Human Thriving: A Conceptual Debate and Literature Review.” European Psychologist 22, no. 3 (2017): 167–179.
Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. “Calling and vocation at work: Definitions and prospects for research and practice.” The Counseling Psychologist 37, no. 3 (2009): 424–450. https://doi.org/0011000008316430.
Erikson, Erik H. 1963. Childhood and Society. 2nd ed. New York: Norton.
Frontiers in Sustainable Cities. “Urban human needs: conceptual framework to promoting urban city fulfills human desires.” 2024.
Health & Place. “The relationship between physical activity environment, mental wellbeing, flourishing and thriving: A mixed method study.” Health & Place 81 (2025): 102984.
Hill, P. L., & Turiano, N. A. (2014). Purpose in life as a predictor of mortality across adulthood. Psychological Science, 25(7), 1482–1486.
Hursthouse, Rosalind. 1999. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kahn, William A. 1990. “Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work.” Academy of Management Journal 33(4): 692–724.
Keyes, Corey L. M. 2002. “The Mental Health Continuum: From Languishing to Flourishing in Life.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 43(2): 207–222.
Keyes, Corey L. M., et al. “Beyond a single story: The heterogeneity of human flourishing in 22 countries.” International Journal of Wellbeing 13, no. 5 (2023): 3555.
Lee, Matthew T., and Michael J. Mayor. “Health and Flourishing: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis.” In Flourishing: Dialogues on the Science of Well-Being, edited by Matthew T. Lee and Michael J. Mayor, Springer, 2022.
Maslow, Abraham H. 1943. “A Theory of Human Motivation.” Psychological Review 50(4): 370–396.
Miller, Michelle Ann, Mike Douglass, and Jonathan Rigg. 2020. “Governing Resilient Cities for Planetary Flourishing in the Asia-Pacific.” Environment and Urbanization Asia 11(1): 1–18.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ryff, Carol D. 1989. “Happiness Is Everything, or Is It? Explorations on the Meaning of Psychological Well-Being.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57(6): 1069–1081.
Ryan, Richard M., and Edward L. Deci. 2013. “What Humans Need: Flourishing in Aristotelian Philosophy and Self-Determination Theory.” In Human Autonomy in Cross-Cultural Context: Perspectives on the Psychology of Agency, Freedom, and Well-Being, 45–64. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ryff, Carol D. 1989. “Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57(6): 1069–1081.
Ryff, Carol D. 2014. “Psychological Well-Being Revisited: Advances in Science and Practice.” Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 83(1): 10–28.
Ryff, Carol D., and Burton H. Singer. 2006. “Best News Yet on the Six-Factor Model of Well-Being.” Social Science Research 35(4): 1103–1119.
Seligman, Martin E. P. 2011. Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. New York: Free Press.
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.
Sinek, Simon. “Our Why.” Simon Sinek. Accessed December 6, 2025. simonsinek.com.
Slavich, George M. 2020. “Social Safety Theory: A Biologically Based Evolutionary Perspective on Life Stress, Health, and Behavior.” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 16: 265–295.
Slavich, George M. 2023. “Social Safety Theory: Conceptual Foundation, Underlying Mechanisms, and Future Directions.” Current Directions Science 32(2): 123–134.
The Human Flourishing Program, Harvard University. “Our Flourishing Measure.” 2017.
Thrash, T. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2003). Inspiration as a psychological construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 871–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.871
Wolfram, Marc, Niki Frantzeskaki, and Derk Loorbach. 2021. “Perspectives on urban transformation research: transformations in, of, and by cities.” Urban Transformations 3(1): 1–19.
VanderWeele, Tyler J. 2017. “On the Promotion of Human Flourishing.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(31): 8148–8156.
Verma, S., et al. “Unlocking flourishing at workplace: An integrative review an Psychology* (2025).
Vygotsky, Lev S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Yu, Lu, and Dong Xie. “Cultural Variation in Flourishing.” *J 10.1007/s10902-023-00677-9.